Friday, 23 October 2015

‘War between India and Pakistan is not an option’





Project Pakistan USA, a project of Dr. Mona Kazim Shah, organized a symposium on “War is Not an Option,” at the Naveen Jindal School of ManagementDallas, Texas recently.

Project Pakistan campaigns for human rights issues, runs philanthropic projects, radio shows with space for open mics, and works to encourage dialogue to resolve conflicts and promote South Asian art and culture in the USA.

The focus of the symposium was to bring youth from Pakistan, Kashmir and India together for peace talks and healthy dialogue to take their voices further.

The discussions highlighted the problems faced by India, Pakistan and Kashmir and possible solutions. The four panelists included pro-peace, pro-dialogue journalists, academicians, activists, artists with experience in this area and some have even paid a price for their beliefs.

The panelists were Beena Sarwar a journalist, artist and documentary filmmaker and Raza Ahmad Rumi a journalist and policy analyst from Pakistan; Dr. Amie Maciszewski, an international musician, and Amitabh Pal Managing Editor of The Progressive, the author of "Islam Means Peace: Understanding the Muslim Principle of Nonviolence Today” from India; and Dr. Nyla Ali Khan from the University of Oklahoma from Kashmir .

Dr. Amie Maciszewski started the proceedings by playing “Raag Pahari” on the sitar giving a touch of Kashmir to the audience. For her, Kashmir is a borderland that has been enriched by intercultural encounter, dialogue, and collaboration. She believes that Symposia like this are important for dialogue, collaboration, and ultimately mutual enrichment.

Dr Nyla spoke about Kashmir and the haunting the Valley for numerous years. She believes the younger generation of Kashmiris has witnessed valley’s militarization and grown up traumatized; yet they have tremendous potential which she hopes the right opportunities when available in academia and the government and private sector will encourage their growth. Dr. Nyla highlighted the basic reason of turmoil in the peace process saying, “The most negative thought that would hinder any progress toward a peaceful resolution of the Kashmir issue is the perpetuation of a politics that emphasizes, reinforces, or creates cultural myopia and mono-cultural identities, which in a society as diverse as ours, would be the bane of our existence. This damaging short-sightedness results in intolerance, arbitrary justice, tyranny, and ignorance. The contemporary political discourse in the state, particularly the Kashmir Valley, doesn’t have to be limited to the framework of the two-nation theory. Nor should dissatisfaction with the policies of the Governments of India and Pakistan vis-à-vis Kashmir encourage the glorification of reactionary politics.”

Dr. Nyla suggested that both India and Pakistan should realize that translating the political and social vision into reality requires an effective administrative set-up and vibrant educational institutions (not just intellectualizing), to produce dynamic citizens while remaining aware of the exigencies of the present. She feels that politician’s unable to understand that the changing nature of the struggle need, to look at it with a new vision and pioneering spirit to prevent being marginalized.

A political movement with insufficient attention to people’s welfare, good governance, and rebuilding democratic institutions ends up leaving irreparable destruction in its wake. Also any insurgency or militant nationalist movement that lacks such a vision is bound to falter.

Elections and establishment of a government are not the ends in themselves but are means to nation-building and societal reconstruction. Religious-political rhetoric remains rhetorical without a stable representative government. A resolution to the Kashmir imbroglio promising peace, prosperity, and progress requires unprecedented political will from leaders, policy makers, and civil society on both sides of the Line of Control. The only solution to Kashmir crises that ever came up was when General Pervez Musharraf presented his four points agenda. They were doable and would have resolved the issues.

Dr. Nyla is a strong believer that war is not an option rather firm and practical action needs to be taken to resolve the crises. Since India and Pakistan were founded on the idea of religious difference, the agendas of fundamentalist groups now rule over the Indian subcontinent.

According to her, the border carved at the time of Partition has led to further brutality in the form of riots, pogroms, and organized historical distortions and cultural deletions with which the histories of independent India and Pakistan are replete. War leads to economic exploitation, death and destruction of resources and terrible atrocities on women and children, and innocent civilians bear the brunt of the arrogance of nation-states through exodus of communities and refugee issue. The current plight of Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria speaks volumes about the irreparable damage caused by war .

She believes a strong and prosperous India is a guarantee to peace in the region, along with a strong and prosperous Pakistan to strengthen that guarantee. The goal should be to find a solution to the deadlock which enables peace in the subcontinent, while maintaining the honor of everyone involved.

Amitabh Pal said, “Indians and Pakistanis deserve a better future than the fate their leaders have bestowed on them for more than half a century and both countries need to work toward that – stepby step. These generations are hopefully, not burdened by the weight of history that oppresses so many in India and Pakistan. We have to work toward persuading them because after we are gone, they are the ones who will be at the helm. Only if their minds are changed, can the future of the two countries be any different.”

Regarding his book ‘Islam means Peace’ he said, “The idea of Muslims being inherently violent goes against a lifetime of my observations. So, after the September 11 attacks, I felt a responsibility to correct the distorted picture that has emerged of Islam. My book provides a rebuttal to the general misperceptions of Islam by showing that the tradition of nonviolence within Islam has been rich. My journey of exploration starts with the source texts (the Holy Quran and the Hadiths) and the Messenger of the religion. I chronicle the religion’s history to refute the stereotype that it was spread largely by violence. And I give examples of the myriad peaceful movements in the Muslim world (such as the lawyers’ agitation against Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan) to show how nonviolence has been practiced in recent times. Obviously, the message of Islam has been highly distorted by Al Qaeda, ISIS, and their ilk. My purpose is to show how this is not what Islam says, and to provide an alternative perspective that can be readily appreciated.”

Raza Rumi a journalist and an author of the book “Delhi by Heart: Impressions of a Pakistani Traveler,” gave his views on how social media had impacted the relations between the south Asians. He believes after the Holocaust, partition of the subcontinent resulting migrations hold great significance, as both episodes were directly related to politics and religion. In present circumstances citizens of India and Pakistan are suffering from lack of basic necessities of life but there is no end to weapons and missile expansion and strengthening of military at the borders.

Speaking of the electronic and print media, including social media, he said these mediums have caused more damage to the cause of a peaceful solution finding than anything else. Whenever there are chances of something good coming out of talks, the old narrative of hate politics and war starts erupting and no one is able to focus on the positive steps.

According to Rumi, “The media is a powerful player now, even stronger than state actors. It has a vital role in shaping public opinion for peace-building. However, the disturbing corporatization of media means that you have to sell conflict for profits. This is why peace and diplomacy find less traction and more sensational stuff is witnessed with grave implications for future peace efforts.”India and Pakistan need to start trade to improve their economies to have a prosperous market.

Beena Sarwar spoke to the audience on a very positive note, “Politicians, business people and even common people are capable of bringing about change; youth does not have the baggage to carry on the animosity. Most want to live in peace with good relations. I believe that the change is happening, but it will take time.” She added, “I don’t see any way our region can progress unless there is peace between our two countries. The people of both countries want good relations. There are political hurdles and disagreements but that is no reason to prevent trade and travel. If USA and China can trade with each other and allow their people to meet, if the people of France and Germany who were bitter enemies once can live together, why can India and Pakistan not move towards better relations?”

The generation which has grown up with mutual hate rhetoric, is more sensible and realize that war is not the solution to this crises. Beena said, “There will always be some who will fall prey to the propaganda, but by and large, people are far smarter than the media give them credit for. People have found their own ways of communicating and bypassing the barriers to a great extent. The ‘religious quarters’ may say what they like but people know the difference between propaganda and news. The Pakistani public has never voted in the “religious parties” though they may pay lip service to them, maybe because these ‘religious quarters’ are quick to label anyone as lesser Muslims or anti-Islam.”

The symposium was on webcast a many people say the interactions live in Pakistan and India also, the audience were open and receptive to the speakers and their suggestions, and it can be said that overall the symposium was a success.

The Kashmir issue must be resolved and that can happen only when both India and Pakistan sit down and talk amicably. All these years Kashmir has suffered due to these two countries, its time the issue is resolved once and for all. In the recent UNGA session PM Nawaz Sharif presented four points to resolve the long standing issue peacefully but India has refused to pay heed to it. Such emotional out bursts will not help the humans of Kashmir nor is it going to help the current scenario of the region. Times, politics and strategies of this region have changed it has to be understood by the leaders before it is too late.

This article was published in The Nation on 23 Oct 2015

Sunday, 6 September 2015

Unity won us the 65 war




Within a short period of 18 years of its existence Pakistan came to fight a full fledged war with India. Prior to this there had been various skirmishes between the two countries.
The Indian Commander in Chief had boasted that he will have his drinks in lawns of the Lahore Gymkhana at 10 am on 6th September but he had did not have luck on his side and the Indian soldiers fearing of being encircled and trapped got on their nerves and they retreated.
On 6th September 1965 afternoon Pakistan’s President Field Marshal Ayub Khan spoke to the nation on Pakistan Radio and said, "Mere Aziz Humwatno, Dushman nai janta usne kis kaum ko lalkara hia (The enemy does not know whom it has challenged as a nation)." While speaking to people who had heard that speech say it was obvious that no one was afraid that the war had started. Instead everyone was jubilant and wanted to take part in it as much as they could.
The army conveys on the move were stopped by people who brought food for them, ladies gave them their gold ornaments. The next day people witnessed the famous aerial dog fight over Lahore which was not only praised by the public but people abroad too.
The Nation interviewed three retired army men who took part in the war Brig Rauf Ahmed Khan, Lt Col Syed Mukhtar Hussain, another officer who wanted to remain anonymous and an Admiral Tasneem Ahmed of the Pakistan Navy. Following are excerpts of the interview:
Vice Admiral Ahmed Tasneem was commissioned in Royal Australian Navy 1.1.57 after initial training in UK. “Then I was posted as ADC to FM Ayub khan. This is the time when Ayub Khan took the famous visit to the US and persuaded Kennedy to give submarine to Pakistan Navy. I asked him to relieve me so I could join the submarine force. He agreed and I was part of the crew that went to US for training and brought back PNS Ghazi for induction in the PN through Suez Canal. Later Ghazi joined the fleet in 1965 and played a decisive role with me as 2nd in command.
“We patrolled around Bombay to test Indian defenses for 30 days then came back, we sailed again on 1st and the war started on the 6th. It was obvious since the incidents in May and June at Raan of Kutch and Kashmir and some across border activity. Our main achievements were:
1. We had a submarine no other country had in the region which was a force multiplier and it weighed heavily in our favour. In fact the Indian Navy did not come out of harbor due to the Ghazi threat.
2. Navy was very well trained under the CINC Admiral AR Khan. The nation was united and spirit was high. Forces fight with nation’s support. Indians did not want to lose their ships to Ghazi. Even Vikrant the aircraft carrier did not come out. The operation was planned for 7th and 8th September night. Seven ships went to 5 miles off dwarka and each lunched 50 rounds, it had three effects
1, blocked the IN port
2, Radar knocked out which reduced the air effort
3, PN morale raised
He explained how the Navy reacted to President Ayub Khan’s speech. “Launching an attack is declaration of war . We were in enemy waters when we heard of the attack on Lahore, and heard the speech of Ayub Khan. The speech raised the morale of the sailors and they were charged with the spirit to defend the motherland. The nation’s unity was a factor, and coordination between the three forces was a decisive factor.
“Ghazi’s antenna seal leaked so we had to return for mainland on 12th or 13th September. So to hide the fact that Ghazi was in dock for repairs, we were put in a floating dock and the water was not pumped out so we could be hidden. However we went in at high tide and when the tide turned the submarine tilted I had gone home to take a bath and I got a call and I ran back to port to save the sub. So that was an incident in which we almost lost the sub in dock rather than in battle.
“In 1965 Pakistan was one dimensional force barring one submarine, today we are a four dimensional arm, sub, surface, air and marine arm. Money is always a concern, and today the navy is deployed in many areas, including anti-terrorism and anti-piracy duties on high seas, for the last two years. So we need to keep it afloat; ships are expensive but politics and such often plays a role in this. We need more fuel we have load shedding we need fuel for power generation, sea routes carry our exports, so if a port is blocked we run into myriad problems of movement.
Brig Rauf Ahmed Khan joined the Pakistan Military Academy Kakul in May 1960 and after two and a half years of training he got commission in 9 FF in October 1962. The battalion was located in Malakand fort then, and later moved to Kharian where it was garrisoned when the war started.
“On 6 September we got the orders to reach Pasrur, we left Kharian at 2:30pm. I was leading the convey from Kharian in my jeep, when reached near the Wazirabad bridge I saw there were some 15 to 20 people standing there, including women. I told them to clear the road as the war has started and the enemy may carry out an air attack. They were there with four big buckets of milk, which they had brought for us . We could not carry all of it, and it would have been very impolite if we refused them outrightly. So we all took a few sips of it, thanked them and left with their well wishes and prayers. This was the passion of the public and support for the army on that day.
“When I was in the Battalion headquarter at about 3 pm we got a message that Lt Qudus Mirza the Artillery observer needed to be evacuated as he was injured in the firing. He was not only my batch mate but part of my platoon so I told my CO that I will take the task to evacuate him. I went with my driver in a jeep.
“I learnt that Lt Qudus Mirza was attacking the enemy tanks with anti-tank recoilless rifle. His Hawaldar had destroyed three enemy tanks, but when the dust rose it was visible to the enemy where they were being attacked from. The enemy’s fourth tank fired at the position and the Anti-tank rifle crew embraced shahadat, and Lt Qudus was a injured when a shrapnel hit his leg. He was laid in a trench, but as he was in great pain when I reached, we made sure he should be taken out with care and put into the jeep. I briefed his hawaldar to take Lt Qudus to the nearest first aid camp as soon as possible. As soon as Lt Qudus Mirza left we heard an attack from Phillora side, we had expected that the jeep would have been attacked. But years later when I met Lt Qudus he said if I had not told them to speed away from that area he may not have lived.
He speaks of the time that was just before 6 September. “There were skirmishes in the area of the Raan of Kuch starting in April-May. Operation Gibraltar got underway in August and Operation Grandslam in September. We definitely were witnessing things leading to war . The Army was mentally and physically prepared and it was beyond understanding how the Foreign Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto had thought that in reply to these operations how the enemy would not cross the international borders. It was a faulty analysis by him. We have been very unfortunate because we had secured a large amount of area in Operation Grand Slam we had reached Jaurian and Indian army was on the run, but we paid a heavy price when General Akhtar Malik was removed and Gen Yahya was given the Command against all norms and protocol and against teachings of battle. Gen Yahya took 36 hrs to assess and re-plan the operation and that gave time to India to regain its position and hit back. This one decision was a great loss. However by that time the PAF had gained superiority and that helped is stopping the counter attack by the Indians.”
Col Mukhtar was commissioned in July 53, posted to 9 FF in Kharian Cantt in the unit. He spoke about the start of war said; Army was already deployed in field location and expected an Indian attack sometime.
“We were at Kharian, and moved to battle location on 6th September. When we moved out on 6 sept to Pasrur our battle location, middle of night 6/7 September we got information that there was threat of Indian para-drop at Eimenabad near Gujranwala to cut the Lahore-Pindi GT road, we moved at night and early morning of 7th four Indian aircraft flew over us to hit Sargodha, were shot down by MM Alam and they did not return. We then moved back to Chowinda sector. On the evening 10-11, around 8 pm we got orders to move to relieve 24 Brigade around Phillora cross, and the battalion occupied the area of the brigade, that is a company to occupy a battalion position each. They moved to Chowinda while we blocked Phillora. The morning saw Indian tank assault and one company was over run and an antitank crew hit tanks and slowed the assault, one company on area 40 r was untouched. We came under heavy artillery and tank attacks but we stood our ground and gave 24 Brigade the needed 24 hours to defend the area.
“We started pulled out on orders from HQ on 11th and were told that Phillora cross was secure. However, when we got there it was under Indian occupation, and we were hit again. However, our troops shouted at the Indian soldiers repeating Ayub’s “tum nae kis qaum ko larkara hai.” We managed to fight and blunt the Indian assault, and captured an Indian officer also. I put him in a jeep and told Captain Mehdi to take him to the HQ but in the cross fire later the driver and Indian officer were killed. We extricated ourselves in small groups, I was the last man to come out of there and there was a Sherman tank there I went round it and I saw that a rocket launcher person Naik Dilbagh and said come lets fire at this tank, but he said his number two was not with him. The next day I reached the HQ, and was told by the adjutant that they had given us up as dead, and were about to send a missing believed killed report. The area was littered with disabled tanks, and 11 cavalry and 25 cavalry proved better than the Indian tanks.”
Col Mukhtar spoke about the ceasefire. “Before cease fire a brigade of 1st armored division which was at Khem Kharan – Lahore had joined us . An counter attack was planned to encircle Indian troops, but Sahibzada Yaqub armor expert at Corps HQ said these troops are not corps or army but national reserve and postponed the counter attack as cease fire was also coming so it was postponed.”
He gave his views on Tashkant saying, “As for tashkaent as far as we the troops and army knew it was the higher level government decision, but Gen Musa the chief had been fighting for increase of Infantry division in the army, Shoaib the finance minister refused to give the money. Six lancers had infiltrated India and were almost at Amritsar, but due to no infantry support had to pull back. It is said that Gen Musa then went and threw the file at Shoaib and told him that the infantry div would have meant that Amritsar would have been with Pakistan today, and we would also not have let India enter our territory even by a single yard. As far as Tashkenst, Bhutto was an evil genius with his own designs, and he never told the nation about what happened there. After the war I was then posted to the newly raised 21 FF in Sialkot and I wrote in the monthly report that Bhutto has resigned due to health reasons and we pray for his health. The acting CO called me and said why tell a lie, he has resigned to go against Ayub Khan. But I am glad to say 9 FF was able to give the much needed time of almost 36 hours to 24 brigade, which carried the day.”
“Personally feel Pakistan has a great future especially with coming closer to china and started thinking independently and not following dictates of others. We have a wonderful future Pakistan will emerge as a strong nation in the region and easily dominate Indian strategy or game. Strength of conviction is that the nation is united today for this effort,” he said regarding the future of Pakistan.
“Performance and achievements were such that people started believe that like angels can in Badar, same happened here, it was the performance that carried the day. As for suicide attacks on tanks I have not seen myself but there were sugarcane fields in the area and men could not be seen in it, and there were instances where a soldier went thru the crop and put an antitank mine in front of the tanks track, if anyone of those died I can’t say if that is where these stories got currency.”
On how the war ended Col Mukhtar says, “11th September was Quaid’s death anniversary and also it was the day 9 FF stopped the Indian assault and saved the country. Devine help … nothing visual seen, but Allahs help was there, there was no way to get out without that, especially when coming out of Phillora the intensity of fire was too much to be saved from without Allahs help.
Allah, Artillery, Air Force the three A’s
“11 Cavalry command vehicle had fallen in enemies hands, and they were listening to all our wireless communications. Guides Cavalry sent to relieve 9 FF however they were too thin on ground and stretched so were asked to fall back leaving 9 FF alone to face the enemy. We extricated in small groups and that in itself was a help from Allah,” Col Mukhtar said.
Another retired army officer shared his views on condition on anonymity. In September 1965 he was a captain and Pakistan had a situation going on in Kashmir, the Pakistan Army has been moved to the borders, and was undergoing fulltime training and preparing for a full-fledged war , which left us with no time to have any apprehensions regarding the war . “We were focusing on only one thing and that was on how to give the enemy a befitting reply,’ he said.
When asked about the one thing that could be the trigging point of 1965 war he replied, “Operation Gibraltar triggered some activity in Kashmir, and India over reacted to it, which was not acceptable to us . The response to Kashmir should have been limited to Kashmir but their reaction got the situation out of control and headed to war . But there was a flaw at our end too;on our side we should have launched Operation Gibraltar with proper preparation which would have led to lesser problems. We then followed up with the operation with Grand Slam, which was an attack in the Chamb area to get to Akhnoor and cut the line of communications going to Kashmir. That operation ran into difficulties again when the chain of command was changed midway, and Indians attacked the International Borders. We had a close fight, in which artillery and Pakistan Air Force responded with full might and stopped them (Indian’s) at the border, where they even lost some territory.”
Regarding Tashkant Declaration he said, “It was not so bad for Pakistan, we could have had a better deal, but Mr Bhutto did what was needed and it could not have been possible without the consent of the President (FM Ayub Khan).”
On how to find a place in the international community again, he said “Pakistan needs to sort out its internal situation so that it can earn a standing in the International community. Our strategic locations potential can only be realized with, internal security, bilateral relations with all the neighbors, be part of the global financial groups’ like EU, SAARC, IMF etc., so that our trade ties expand and helps us to revive our position.”
While the debate of who won and who lost the 1965 war between Pakistan and India, one thing stands out even today 50 years after the war ended, that the Pakistani nation stood united as one, behind the armed forces, and rather than going in trenches to save their lives they stood on the roof tops of their houses to applaud the Air Force against the enemy planes. People stopped the military convoys on the road and offered food and milk to the soldiers. And everyone was taken up by the spirit of 65.
History teaches us many lessons, a smaller force took on a larger force and stood its ground against all odds, what united the nation was the "spirit" and unity in the faith which came to the fore in the discipline that the nation and the armed forces displayed in the hour of trial.
We need the same spirit today so that we as a nation are able to get our place in the comity of nations and not be labeled as anything but a resiliently alive nation!

This article was published in The Nation on 6th Sept 2015

Friday, 4 September 2015

Anguish of Being


We are made from one dough
But sought and bought 
By wedding bells
For different price
Made to believe
In best pairs
Long lasting affairs
But it all is
A one night stand
Next is nothing
But the usual tale
No fairies
No prince or princess
No charms
Then the kids
A vicious circle begins
With modernization
New trends
Exploring worlds
But forgetting that
For you it is your belief
For me is mine
Nothing reaching
The point of no return
Expect politics and religion...
Saqii
10:20 pm
3 September 2015